Mom is in a home with a two-year private pay. Mom is a very difficult woman with demensia and this home is somehow coping with her needs. There are five kids with one very greedy older sister who has POA. Greedy sister wants to rent mom's house and sell after mom passes. In doing this she says that mom will be on medicade after her two-year private pay. In order to do this we'd have to take out a loan to be able to pay the second year of private pay. My issue is that the group home's contract says they can ask a client to leave for any reason and after two-years private pay this may very well happen to mom (this goes the other way also in that the client can leave at any time). I want to sell house and use the money to take care of her without resorting to medicade. This is her money for her care and greedy sister is just cooking up a plan that will guarantee this house money lands in her pocket (actually all of our pockets an mom's will states "share and share alike). Does anyone know is this even the way that medicade works?? My heart hurts because mom deserves the best care that HER money can provide, I just don't think she's going to get the quality of care when she is state assisted. Mom is a very big pain in the butt and if the home is getting only a third of the money they usually get, I see them showing her way to the door.
Even if the house will always be exempt, the state will file a claim for the Medicaid it paid to the nursing home during your mother's life, following her death. They cannot seek reimbursement out of the children's assets, only from your mother's assets, i.e., the house.
If your sister sells the house, the money is still your mother's, and she will have too much money to qualify for Medicaid (which has a limit of $2,000 for a single person). It will be possible to do some "Medicaid planning" to protect most of that money, which is what I discuss in my book "How to Protect Your Family's Assets from Devastating Nursing Home Costs: Medicaid Secrets."
I don't see how your sister is correct if she is saying your mother will be on Medicaid after two years, if the house is sold, for the above reasons.
Medicaid typically has a 5 year look-back, meaning that any transfer of assets within a five year period from the date of the Medicaid application is included in Mom's available assets to pay for her own care. In other words, if your sister sells the house and distributes the money and Mom runs out of funds to pay for her own care (before 5 years are up), then Medicaid will consider the money from the sale of the house to be Mom's money and they will not start to pay for Mom's care until AFTER that amount paid by Mom. Example: if your sister got $100,000 for the house, then Mom would be liable for $100,000 worth of care before Medicaid would kick in. So, if your sister insists on scheming to get an inheritance, she better set the money aside for when her scheme backfires or she'll have to come up with the cash or care for Mom herself when Medicaid won't pay.
There's more to it than this (Medicaid is pretty complex), but that's the gist of it. Your family should see an a lawyer who specializes in elder law. This stuff isn't for amateurs and you can get yourselves into very sticky situations.
Now, neither one of you has enough information to know. IsntEasy is right: get professional help for that goal that you and your sister actually have in common. Good for you both!
The home is Mom's, the expenses are Mom's. Sell the home, and spend the money on her care. It is dishonest to distribute assets to family, and leave it to taxpayers to pick up the tab for her care.
What do I know about it? I'm spending my savings on quality care for my wife, not looking for loopholes to shelter money for our kids. Thankfully, they are with me on this, 100%.
In this age of entitlement, we need another "Every American deserves..." statement. "Every American deserves the right to pay their own way until every dollar has been spent honestly and responsibly." Let's keep helping those who truly need help.
I, too, agree with Lonelyboy, it's awful in this country that there is little to no relief for caregiving needs, as well as caregiver's needs. Do they think people can just quit their jobs and stay home, while twitching their noses for their own food, water, lodgings, healthcare, etc.?
Your sister cannot possibly do this on her own no matter what she says it takes an attorney to do it correctly or she could wind up in a world of hurt and you could lose the estate anyway.
Just because she has POA (so do I) it is not ethical in my opinion to make such decisions without the input from other siblings as you all have a stake in this. I hope your Mom had a trust written up years ago and not just a will or if it is a will it is one that was written by an attorney and signed in front of a notary with witnesses. If not, I would be scared.
POA and possibly all of you need to sit down with an attorney who specializes in family law and Medicaid. You all need to hear what is said and how you can make provisions legally. Do no try this without legal assistance. If you all hear the pros and cons you can then either stand behind her or seek to have her removed from her position.
You might want to read and have POA read Attorney Heiser's book as he seems to always have correct and insightful information.
If Mom does end up needing Medicaid, her current placement may be fine with that, and her care might not change at all - my dad was cared for just as well before and after Medicaid. You may want to scout out other facilites in advance, maybe some non-profits, and actually go visit some so you know what you might be able to find if Mom in fact gets the boot from her current place. They typically are required to giver 20 or 30 days notice unless something is really emergent that they can't handle. We also looked at home care options for my Mom, and there may be something that could work for you, but my Mom just did not want anyone in her home or want to be there if she could not walk and do everything herself, could not get her used to the idea and she threw out three different home health company reps that tried to explain what they could do...
After Dad passed on and it was very clear that Mom could not return home, I did go ahead and use my POA to sell and put the proceeds in a trust for Mom's care, and we used them all before she passed on. In my situation, renting would not have worked out, and Mom would have ended up on Medicaid here in AR if she had lived a lot longer; thanks to the eldercare lawyer consultation we knew in advance how that would have worked. Knowing we could care for Mom on her income plus a manageable contribution from us gave us a lot of peace of mind. Also, because she really had no assets left, there was no estate recovery, and the only inheritance we had was from a no-cash-value life insurance policy of my dad's which passed to my husband and I; we had not had to tap it for her care, and those are specifically exempt from estate recovery (we'd had to cash in all of Mom's except the burial insurance to get Dad on Medicaid.)
Sorry this is so hard and complicated. It is very hard or impossible to know exactly how things will play out, and I don't think either of you is greedy for trying to have something left when Mom passes on as long as you are also providing the best care and quality of life possible. Hopefully your attorney can spell it all out on a chalkboard for you the way ours did, and hopefully the most sensible solution, with contingency plans, will emerge!